Canada needs to change it’s outdated laws regards bestiality

Comments Off on Canada needs to change it’s outdated laws regards bestiality

“This is sickening, having any sort of sexual engagement with an animal should be a crime…why the hell would any normal person think it’s ok??? Animals cannot speak for themselves, so we have to…it’s rape with or without penetration!!”

 By: 

Large Canadian Flag, on Interior, Home Wall

A ruling by the Canadian Supreme Court said an alleged offence can only be classed as bestiality if there is penetration!

It came from a case involving a man who smeared peanut butter on his stepdaughters’ genitals and had the family dog lick it off, while filming the act.

The man, identified only as DLW, was convicted of 13 counts of sexually assaulting his stepdaughters, and jailed for 16 years.

The counts included one of bestiality – but he has now been acquitted of the bestiality charge. 

The court said: ‘The term ‘bestiality’ has a well-established legal meaning and refers to sexual intercourse between a human and an animal.

‘Penetration has always been understood to be an essential element of bestiality.’

A 7-1 majority ruled that bestiality required penetration.

DLW, who also failed in attempts to make the dog perform intercourse on the stepdaughter, according to court documents, brought the bestiality conviction to the court on appeal.

Justice Rosalie Abella was the only judge to vote against the proposal.

She wrote: ‘Acts with animals that have a sexual purpose are inherently exploitative whether or not penetration occurs.’

Camille Labchuk, the executive director of charity Animal Justice, toldMetro.co.uk: ‘The Supreme Court’s decision is a wake up call that laws protecting animals are severely out of date.

News Link:-http://metro.co.uk/2016/06/10/canada-has-made-a-surprising-change-to-its-bestiality-laws-5935923/

 

Advertisements

Disturbing Content: Ruling by Supreme Court and Response from the Justice Minister

Comments Off on Disturbing Content: Ruling by Supreme Court and Response from the Justice Minister

“Any form of bestiality should be made illegal. An animal cannot converse, thereby cannot give it’s consent in anyway whats so ever!! So it’s clear to me that is the same as rape, no verbal communication can be given! It’s time the law was changed & these sicko’s brought to justice for such actions!”

Calgary,Alberta / News Talk 770 (CHQR) Posted: June 10, 2016 09:10 am

Written By Danielle Smith 

WARNING: Contents may disturb some readers (it should actually disturb all readers)

I have gotten used to being disappointed by government but today’s shocking decision by the Supreme Court legalizing some types of bestiality leaves me speechless

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of a BC man on charges of bestiality, stemming from sexual abuse involving one of his daughters and the family dog. The reason for the acquittal was because the court deemed bestiality to have “a well-established legal meaning and refers to sexual intercourse between a human and an animal.” In other words, it only applies in the case of penetration and not to any other type of non-penetrative sexual activity.

“Please let’s not forget the daughter, she will have to live with this for life!”

In the 6-1 decision, the sole voice of reason was Justice Rosalie Abella who wrote:

“Acts with animals that have a sexual purpose are inherently exploitative whether or not penetration occurs.”  Unfortunately her colleagues didn’t agree. Now it falls to Parliament to change the law to include both types of sexual activity.

This loophole was exposed last year when the case was sent to the Supreme Court. It is mystifying why Parliament wouldn’t have dealt with it immediately. Instead it appears to be slowed down as part of an omnibus bill that was introduced into the Parliament back in February. What’s going on? My producer wrote to the Justice Department to find out.

Below are the screen shots of the email correspondence…

I’m a Producer for Afternoons with Danielle Smith on News Talk 770 Radio Calgary. I am wanting to know if we could get a statement on this latest ruling from the Supreme Court on Bestiality and if there will be any movement from the Justice Minister on rectifying this issue. Here’s a link to the story.

producer-email

ministers-response

Are you kidding me?

Fixing this section of the act requires a revision to the Criminal Code to enshrine a broader definition for bestiality. It only takes one sentence to clarify the law. The Supreme Court ruling so offends community values I have no doubt it would pass through both the House of Commons and the Senate in five seconds. It doesn’t “deserve careful study”. It doesn’t need “broad consultations with Canadians.” It just needs Parliament to do its job. Just get it done.

If you agree I suggest you contact Justice Minister Jody Wilson Raybould to let her know exactly how you feel.

Email:- Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca Website:- www.vancouvergranville.ca

jody-wilson-raybould

News Link:-http://www.newstalk770.com/2016/06/10/129472/

GRAPHIC Content:Brittany Sonnier Accused Of Engaging In Illicit Acts With Family Dogs : Your Comments??

Comments Off on GRAPHIC Content:Brittany Sonnier Accused Of Engaging In Illicit Acts With Family Dogs : Your Comments??

“OMG…WTF…there are 3 words, that when used in the same sentence, really disturb & freak me out!!! Those 3 words are BESTIALITY, INCEST & CHILDREN!!! This woman has sex with dogs, fantasies about incest & has a child…wouldn’t that ring alarm bells in anyone’s mind??”

“She is seriously sick in the head…anyone who fantasies about INCEST shouldn’t be around children; let alone have a child. I have serious concerns for the safety of the child; not necessarily from her, but from like-minded people, she may hang out with, who may come into contact with the child. Surely the Child Protection Agency will be  a party at the have been informed of her disturbing & perverted status; being charged crimes against nature…in other words, having sex with dogs!!

She isn’t fit to be left around animals let alone a child, after saying the above; this is truly sickening!!”

An Arizona woman who allegedly confessed to her boyfriend that she has sex with dogs and fantasizes about incest has been charged with crimes against nature, police said. “Take a good look at that face below, she is someone you don’t want near your pets or children!!”

ANOMALOUS BRITTANY SONNIER Anomalous Brittany Sonnier -Charged with crimes against nature.  Had sex with family dogs, likes Incest & has 1 child

ANOMALOUS BRITTANY SONNIER – Mother of one child, likes Incest & has sex with dogs...Is this women fit to have children or animals???

Brittany Angelique Sonnier, 20, is accused of committing “vaginal and oral sex with two canines” in Lake Havasu City, according to police Sgt. Joe Harrold. “Why hasn’t her child been taken into protective custody?”

“We received a report … alleging bestiality on the part of Brittany Sonnier. Our investigations bureau investigated the allegations and [then] forwarded a criminal complaint to the county attorney’s office,” Harrold told The Huffington Post.

Sonnier was arrested on November 21 and charged with bestiality. Those charges were later changed to two counts of “crime against nature.”

According to a copy of the police report provided to HuffPost, authorities were tipped off in September by a former boyfriend of Sonnier’s about her alleged illegal four-legged activities.

The ex-boyfriend, the report states, told police he had started dating Sonnier in March or April. The ex, whose name has been redacted from the police report, said Sonnier seemed, “like a nice, sweet and innocent girl.”

Sonnier’s ex told police things went well at first between the two and said he enjoyed spending time with both her and her 11-month-old son. However, during mid-summer the relationship changed, and their sex life began to slow down. It was around this time that Sonnier allegedly approached him and asked if they could “talk.

“They sat down and Brittany used his phone to look some things up,” the police report states. “He expected Brittany to ask if they could have a threesome or if he wanted to be a swinging couple. He would have been fine with either of those things — he is very open.”

The photos, however, indicated different interests, police said.

“Instead, Brittany started to show him pictures of people having sex with animals,” the report states. “She told him that she was interested and into having sex with dogs. She went on to tell him that she has been having sex with their family dogs since she was 13 years old.”

The report states one of the dogs is about 13 and the other is just a couple of years old. They are not identified by breed, but are described as “medium size” dogs in the police report.

The police report further alleges that Sonnier told her boyfriend that she has had “vaginal and oral sex with the dogs” and has trained the animals so they “don’t act strange” around other people. “So that’s how zoophiles can stay undetected, when it’s their pets they are abusing!!”

Sonnier also allegedly said she was into incest and pulled up images on the phone of a family of cartoon characters having sex, police said.

The ex-boyfriend told police he was “disturbed and freaked out” and said he told Sonnier “she was disgusting.” The two broke up shortly thereafter. “She still is disgusting!”

Sonnier’s ex told police he first approached her father and informed him of her alleged bizarre sexual preferences. Sonnier’s dad, according to the police report, allegedly told him that his daughter had in the past admitted to him that “she has been having sex with the family dogs.” Her dad also allegedly said he is in the process of trying to gain custody of his grandson. “When these allegations come out in court, I am hopeful the Judge will make sure the child’s safety is of paramount importance, & place him in the most protective custodial hands!” 

We are talking about an innocent child here; who must be protected at all costs!! It begs the question, why didn’t they think to report her disturbing behaviour; having admitted to her dad about having sex with the dogs??

The ex-boyfriend told police he suspects Sonnier is pregnant with his child, but said she has refused to take a pregnancy test. He said that, if she is pregnant, he wants her to get help. “I hope to God she isn’t, but if she is; serious questions should be asked about her mental stability & ability to keep said child! Just having mentioned the word ‘Incest’ when one has children should set off alarm bells ringing, to the safety of the child!” 

Further allegations by her ex-boyfriend in the police report read:

  • She is a sex addict and he thinks she will be an unfit parent.
  •  He suspects Brittany started to have sex with animals when she was younger because she couldn’t find a partner.
  • He is worried about the child Brittany might be carrying.

Neither Sonnier, her ex-boyfriend nor her father responded to calls and emails requesting comment from The Huffington Post.

According toFacebook page attributed to Sonnier, (Yes her Face book is still live) she is a 2010 graduate of South View High School in Hope Mills, North Carolina. Under “favourite quotations” Aurdey Hepburn is listed, with the following quote, “I was born with an enormous need for affection, and a terrible need to give it.”

Harrold told police Sonnier is scheduled to appear in court on Dec. 5. It was not immediately clear Thursday if she has an attorney to represent her.

“In 2006 Arizona reintroduced a law making it illegal to have sex with an animal, dead or alive.”

“I have allowed comments for this post, I want to know what you think about this? Obviously any crude comments will not be allowed”

%d bloggers like this: